Readiness stops being a feeling and becomes a number
Most programs walk into a go-live gate review with an opinion. AdoptIFS walks in with a scorecard.
Built from LMS completion, assessment scores and pulse sentiment
Simulation proficiency, engagement recency and pulse sentiment, all weighted per persona, because 180 field technicians matter more to a go-live than 8 super users, and an unweighted average hides exactly that.
| Persona | Readiness | vs. standard | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Field TechnicianField Service Engineer | 46.5 | standard 70 | No go |
| Stores OperatorStores Operative | 46.9 | standard 75 | No go |
| DispatcherControl Room Dispatcher | 67.5 | standard 85 | No go |
| Crew SupervisorCrew Supervisor | 74.0 | standard 80 | No go |
| Service DeskCustomer Contact Advisor | 75.5 | standard 85 | No go |
| Maintenance PlannerMaintenance Planner | 84.5 | standard 85 | Conditional |
| Super UserIFS Super User | 92.3 | standard 95 | Conditional |
Laggards, ranked
Not a red flag but a ranked intervention list. Adoption risk × headcount × shortfall, each row carrying the channel that actually reaches that group. “Toolbox talk, SMS, printed van card. Not corporate email.”
Trajectory to go-live
Linear projection from snapshot history. Eight weeks out, it names which personas will miss the standard while there is still time to act.
Honest by design
No data is reported as no data, never as zero. A scorecard that says green before a bad go-live destroys its own credibility permanently.
This is the same scorecard mechanism your account team sees behind the login on the client portal. Ready to see what it costs to run against your program? See engagement tiers.